Post by Indilwen on Aug 4, 2010 16:25:58 GMT 12
Addressed To:
Glenna C. Burmer, M.D., Ph.D
Eric Drexler, Ph.D
Ralph Merkle, Ph.D
Douglas B. Kell, Ph.D
Craig Venter, Ph.D
National Center For Genetic Resources
The Institute For Neural Cryobiology
Alcor Life Extension Foundation
Overview
Geneticists, generally trained within some form of evolutionary paradigm, assume it as the underlying context within which they search and interpret. This paper, written by a generalist for scientists, is submitted as a brief to inform the reader of an archaeological paradigm, developed over a century and a half, which renders outmoded, corrects and subsumes both the Darwinian evolutionary and creationist models, as related to human history, and provides an expanded, fresh perspective on DNA research.
The most fundamental, critical obstacle blocking interpretive and explanatory progress in the sciences – as well as our educational, political and social processes -- is our lack of a consensual definition of what a generic human being is, what it is to be generically human. Theological, philosophical, scientific and new age definitions rattle around in a criteria vacuum. The creationist-evolutionist conflict is a single, classic example of how effectively we have been Babel-factored into ineffective argument without closure for decades.
The thesis of the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin (1976), provides a robust paradigm which affords the resolution of this, objectively astounding, enervating and divisive problem at the heart of western culture. It frees the discussions of the science, ethics, and philosophy involved from the recycled contexts, criteria and syllogistic gambits which have stultified the western intellect for so long.
Its startling anthropological ramifications provide, not only a generic definition of what a human is but, through a recovered and restored history of our bicameral genome’s initiation and evolution, no less than a key to the decipherment and interpretation of the human genome itself.
Correlated with the current data from the genome projects, general genetics, cloning, and related areas it, further, furnishes vital clues to an explanation of the anomalous fact of our presenting with four thousand plus and counting genetic diseases, a possible reason for so-called “junk” genes, and indicators as to why we should possibly expect to find certain suppressed genes.
A potentially vital and startling contribution to human history by the science of genetics, as a spin off of the current ongoing genome research, is suggested.
Zecharia Sitchin is one of two hundred Sumerian and Semitic scholars on the planet who can read a clay tablet like you and I can read this text. He published his first work, The Twelfth Planet, in 1976 and, subsequently, another six volumes of the Earth Chronicle Series.
From his knowledge of Sumerian, the Semitic and other ancient languages and his research on the same archaeological and Biblical data and materials studied by all archaeologists, acquired over the last one hundred and fifty years, he put forth a radical thesis: the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient cultures (Sumerian: Anunnaki, meaning “those who came down from the heavens”) were not mythological but real flesh and blood humanoid aliens, very much like humans, who had come here from the tenth planet in our solar system, Planet X in the popular press, called Nibiru by the Sumerians, colonizing Earth some 432,000 years ago.
They subsequently genetically engineered our species, 200,000 years ago, originally as slave animals to work in their gold mines, by crossing their own genes with those of Homo Erectus. We became subservient partners with them and, eventually, they phased off the planet leaving our species on our own.
Before one rejects this thesis out of hand, it is well to understand that it is backed up by highly coherent, well researched, well developed archaeological data, documents, history and some two million items of recovered artifacts. A key factor is our having reached a level of technological advancement which allows us to understand high science and technologies present in the past which, until only very recently, could only seem fantastic – particularly genetic engineering. As is the case with scientists in general, archaeologists can adjust to internal and incidental shifts in their consensual context but, when the paradigm itself is threatened with replacement, there inevitably occurs a great deal of very unscientific chest drumming and incisor display.
Obviously, the obstacle here is the word “alien”. Consider that the cardinal reason why the alien topic has been considered the fringe “belief” of unbalanced personalities for so long has been the relentless promotion of that idea by the government for half a century. The Brookings Institution (think tank) study (early ‘50’s, commissioned by the government) concluded that,
'revelation of the alien presence would cause serious disruption in the fundamentalist religions and society and recommended against.'
But extra-solar system aliens are not our focus here.
The Anunnaki, as depicted in hundreds of carvings, reliefs, drawings, and descriptions in the recovered documents, are quite like us, male and female, generally taller and huskier than humans in those times, from within our solar system, at home in our atmosphere, radically different than the alien types allegedly from other solar systems.
If we are half Anunnaki, that should not be so surprising. At the time they were on the planet, they apparently possessed only ballistic rocketry for interplanetary travel, no anti-gravitic technology yet developed.
Objections To This Thesis
Those trained in the sciences, accustomed to carefully crafted protocols and rigorous proof will, no doubt, question this paradigm in several ways.
Quite reasonably, it may be asked why the Sitchin paradigm has not been embraced by the geneticists’ academic counterparts in archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology if the evidence is as voluminous and robust as claimed. It may also be asked, Why has this not been the known and taught history of our kind through all the millennium, why should there have been suppression and perversion of this knowledge? These questions are best answered in historical context and perspective.
There was literally no such thing as the discipline known as Archaeology in Western culture until the 1800’s. The Roman Church controlled and determined the view of the past. The scholastic world, dominated by the Church, followed docilely. Not until paleontological findings of millions of years forced that view to be reevaluated and Schliemann, a wealthy German merchant, refusing to believe that the ancient cities and peoples were legend, dug up several stages of the city of Troy, was a window into the past opened and the mythic view questioned.
Scientific Archaeology, as we know it, came into existence only when academics reluctantly had to acknowledge the past being dug up and collected by amateurs in the Middle East. Archaeologists promptly came to be mistrusted and hated by the religious institutions who feared revelations that would contradict their teachings and the history of the Old Testament.
Most in the scientific world are familiar with the scientist, Galileo, having to capitulate to the Inquisition to save his own life, dying while under house arrest for holding to a heliocentric view of the solar system, claiming to see planets through his telescope. Fewer are aware of the fact that the monk, Giordano Bruno, was burnt at the stake in Rome, through the solicitousness of the Roman Church, only thirty six years before the founding of Harvard University, for holding to the Copernican view and claiming that there had to be other planets and other civilizations in the cosmos.
No one in America, literally, had a Doctorate, at the time of the founding of Harvard University, in 1636 by John Harvard. Increase Mather, a president of Harvard, as a Dissenter, was ineligible for a Doctorate from any English university because all of them were controlled by the Church. Fourteen years after the founding of Harvard, Bishop James Uusher published his “Annales Vertis et Novi Testamenti” dating the beginning of the world at 4004 B.C.
One could be condemned as a heretic for contraverting this doctrine by decree of the Church in 1654 and the stricture was not removed until 1952 (!) by Pope Pius XII. The arithmetical wonder of this fact is that was only 48 years ago. Consider that almost everything written in this paper would have been branded as “heresy” and who knows how DNA research would have been branded only a short time ago.
As late as 1906, the Egyptian Exploration Fund, whose charter stated it was set up to promote archaeologists whose work would reinforce the Old and New Testament, refused to publish the discovery of an Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mount Horeb in the Sinai by Sir Flinders Petrie, the most distinguished in his field at the time. When he published privately they pulled his funding, had the book expunged from the publisher’s records and the British Library never cataloged the work --- on one of the most important discoveries in archaeology. (Sir Laurence Gardner: Bloodline Of The Holy Grail, Genesis Of the Grail Kings )
The mythic interpretation has been promulgated by religions because to recognize the Anunnaki as real would be to open the door to a radical reinterpretation of the entire phenomenon of religion and put into question the real identity of the very deity at center of their belief system. To relegate all the Anunnaki “gods” and their deeds --- except Enlil/Jehovah/Yahweh, the God of the Judeo-Christian religions, who was sublimated out of that category --- to fictional, mythic, unreal status was supremely effective to this end. It is through this millenniums-old tradition of suppression, mythization and manipulative control that the character, content and interpretation in the academic arena has been set and remains, largely, even to this day. Very few are going to make a rubber burning one-eighty over their Ph.D. thesis in Mythology.
In Archaeology, Anthropology, and Paleontology, tenure tetanus prevents most from “going first” to admit they have been wrong in a turn as significant and profoundly revolutionary, perhaps even more so, than the Darwinian shock. Collegiate colitis is all too frequent just from contemplating having to contradict oneself in front of students.
Peer pressure finishes off all but the isolated courageous academic or scientist here and there. Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) is proven correct again. If you want that Ph.D. diploma you will repeat what you know you are supposed to believe and say. If you want that job, that funding... The reason becomes apparent why the academic arena has attempted to ignore this forbidden archaeology and anthropology, and why a few more ruthless of the academic power elite have tried to get Sitchin quick and nasty ad hominem just outside the fact forum.
To this day, Anglican clergy still sit on the boards of English universities. In America, the Constitution is only a negative restraint on religious authoritarian domination. Our schools of higher “learning” still parade the trappings of the medieval university on ceremonial occasions and, unfortunately, all too often still in their limitation of discussion to approved subjects. That the influence of religion on science is still virulent is manifest in the deference shown by politicians to religionists in decisions in matters of genetic research.
The ordinary scientist, although perhaps open and cognizant of the serious scientific objections that have been raised against classic Darwinian theory, is reluctant to question or reassess the evolutionary paradigm because of the erroneous fear that creationism would be the only alternative. In effect, the acceptance of the new paradigm is more difficult because it supersedes and corrects both the creationist and the Darwinian models.
The Creationists were only half wrong and the Evolutionists only half right: there was a creation event but it was a genetic engineering process; there is an evolutionary process but it was not linear from the time the lightning hit the mud to us as the pinnacle of creation. It was interrupted in our regard by the Anunnaki for their own practical purposes. We shall be compelled to introduce an additional category: a genetically synthesized species.( And, if a voice out there is heard to say "Well, thank God for Darwin regardless of how imperfect his work was.." many of us will still not catch the irony in that statement....)
In our time, the position of the genetic specialist can become quite personally disconcerting. Having been trained as an undergraduate to uncritically accept some variation on the Darwinian evolutionary theme, tending to look to fellow scientists, particularly the archaeologists, biologists, and anthropologists for answers to the “big” questions, conditioned, if only subliminally, by religio-cultural tradition, the geneticist finds it difficult enough to decipher the genome much less consider a radically revolutionary paradigm forcing a complete rethinking of the planet.
The purpose of this paper is to respectfully facilitate just that process for the geneticist because the new paradigm contains vital clues and vectors directly related to the geneticist’s quest.
The Demise of the Mythological Explanation of the Gods
Those still holding the mythological interpretation are in an unenviable position. They find themselves having to hold that the same citizens of the first civilizations who, they claim, invented -- or hallucinated -- the gods through their primitive imaginings and naive proto-scientific projections of personality on the great forces of nature were the same primitives who somehow could build the stupendous Giza pyramid; somehow quarry, cut and move into place the one thousand ton stones of the Baalbek “temple” (rocket platform) which even our modern technology cannot begin to lift; somehow know the great precessional cycle of the heavens, the existence of all ten of the planets of our solar system and how our solar system was formed (Enuma Elish document).
The physical locations of the ancient legends as mythic has been gradually disproven beginning with the work of Schliemann and completed with the re-discovery of all the ancient cities and centers on all continents.
The events involving the “gods” of ancient times and the technology attributed to them, previously considered as myth and naive legend, have been gradually proven to be real, beginning with the discovery of documents from the most ancient cities and reinforced with the discovery of the great library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh and the gradual accumulation of some two million pieces of artifact and document confirming those events in great detail. The discovery of ooparts, (high tech tools, toys, artifacts, and technology along with documentation of advanced scientific knowledge ostensibly out of place in time) along with astronomical knowledge of the entire solar system beyond our current level has reinforced the negation of the mythic interpretation.
The interpretation of the “gods”, the Anunnaki themselves, as mythic, unreal beings (academic mythologists) and Jungian archetypes (Joseph Campbell) and the relegation of them to schizophrenic hallucination (Julian Jaynes) has been gradually disproven beginning with the acknowledgment of the reality of the events attributed to them; the discounting of the arguments for their unreality due to the seeming fantastic deeds attributed to them by the development of our technology (rockets, lasers, radio communication, genetic engineering, atomic and particle beam weapons) that duplicate those feats.
This interpretation has been implemented further by the exploration and questions posed early by the German school, pioneers like von Daniken and then completed by the comprehensive and brilliant demonstrations of Sitchin and Sir Laurence Gardner, the English historian and genealogist.
Now that we have begun by walking on the moon and exploring the solar system and have probes going starward, the possibility of an alien civilization coming here is taken for granted and one coming here from inside our solar system trivial, rather than unreal myth. “Mythinformation”, after two hundred years of failure, although still hiding behind tenure in the university, is a dead issue.
The Essence of the Sitchin Paradigm
Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin propounds - proves, in the opinion of this author - that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold.
Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid we could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce.
Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its periodic 3600 year returns.
Some humans were saved by the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had originally genetically created. For thousands of years we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, their soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in the farthest reaches of the planet.
Around 6000 years ago they, probably realizing that they were going to phase off the planet, began to gradually bring humans to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden” and mature and highly advanced character was set up under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” was initiated (Gardner).
These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery schools” but there was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church.
There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.
The Anunnaki became somewhat more remote from humans. By around 1250 B.C. they had gone into their final phase-out mode. The human population and the foremen kings, now left on their own began to fend for themselves. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going through a traumatic transition to racial independence. Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between them.
Religion, as we know it, took form, focused on the “god” or “gods”, clearly and unambiguously known to the humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids, now absent. It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized.
We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went, waiting for Daddy to return to make everything right and tell us what to do for some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions.
The Astronomical Evidence
A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home planet of the Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and characteristics described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased.
Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the residuals, the “wobbles” in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune clearly identifiable.
The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84, produced observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the astronomers on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” -- from which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992 Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information they had at hand, published their findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an “intruder” planet. The search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the ecliptic.
Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his office and they correlated the current findings with the ancient records.
The recovered Enuma Elish document, a history of the formation of our solar system and more, says that, at the time when Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A large wandering planet, called Nibiru, was captured into the system gravitationally.
As it passed by the outer planets it caused the anomalies of their moons, the tilting of Uranus on its side, the dislodging of Pluto from its being a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it into what is now Earth’s orbit to recongeal as Earth, dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all its anomalies.
The shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites. The gouge of our Pacific basin is awesome testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at apogee.
Dr. Robert Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed with all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current probable location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the same.
The Technological Evidence
Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and documents which have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery.
Almost everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc.
The most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced physics community)
Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago.
These ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the historical records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in those times possessing a high technology and that that civilization was indeed the Anunnaki.
The Documentary Evidence
The recorded historical documentation for the existence and deeds of the Anunnaki has become gradually available to us only since the early 1800’s. The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay tablets containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages, military actions and advanced astronomical calculation systems but of the history of the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear from these records that the Sumerians knew these aliens to be real flesh and blood.
The library of the ruler, Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the clay tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading. One of the most impressive finds, in very recent time, has been a sealed, nine foot by six foot room in Sippar holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some 400 elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the history of those ancient times, a sort of time capsule.
The evidence is so overwhelming and robust that, if it weren’t for those with power enough to suppress, it would have been accepted and our world view changed a century ago or, perhaps, sooner.
The Genetic Evidence
The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo-Sapiens and in the same time frame. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000 year old gold mines in that area.)
The evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us.
As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part 3.
Two Definitive Protocols for Proving or Disproving the Sitchin Paradigm
A straightforward approach to prove or disprove the Sitchin paradigm is available from astronomy. A thorough, professional search of our solar system should be able, with current technology, to determine the existence or non-existence of a tenth planet with the characteristics of size, orbit, orbital periodicity, and declination from the ecliptic, as Sitchin has determined from the translations of the ancient records and particularly the Enuma Elish document.
If that planet is not in our solar system or no evidence can be found for an ejection or cataclysmic destructive event then the Sitchin paradigm falls. This search should be undertaken with highest priority. The matter is sufficiently important to clearing up our historical situation that the academic world should be involved as well as the scientific community. It is the opinion of this author and others that, in light of the evidence already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, ‘83-84) and the clear and unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already been found.
A second mode of proof or disproof is available through genetics. We will shortly have the entire human genome read out and its details sorted. That process, and the information available as a result, should afford us the opportunity to examine the entire genome for the evidence of the merging of the two species’ gene codes, Homo Erectus and Anunnaki, a definitive way to prove or disprove Sitchin’s thesis. It is in this process, if proven, that the vital clues to the interpretation of the genome lie as examined in Part 4.
It is the position of this author that, not only will the bicameral nature of the code eventually be recognized but valuable clues found through the new paradigm to a profound understanding of the genome and the human.
The First Factor: Background of Conditioning to Subservience
The overwhelming evidence from the Sitchin paradigm demonstrates conclusively that we were genetically engineered by the Anunnaki and treated as slaves and then limited partners but always as subservient to them. The major ramification (Neil Freer: Breaking the Godspell) of the Sitchin explication is that “religion”, as we have known it, is the transmutation, sublimation of the Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery and then limited, subservient partnership. Since then, we have been going through phases of a traumatic transition to species maturity and independence.
The major characteristic of this process has been the transmutation in all cultures of them, in particular Enlil/Jehovah in Western culture, into a cosmic deity, commonly called “God” in the Judeo-Christian tradition. (Is this atheism? No, not as such. It simply is a long overdue correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective.
Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of the particular local Nefilim "god" of the Hebrew tribe and Christianity, Yahweh/Jehovah. The new paradigm, once the ancient, subservient godspell is dispelled, simply frees us to go one on one with the universe as our own evolutionary artists and to seek directly whatever unthinkable or thinkable ultimate principle is behind it.)
In a later phase we have mythologized them into unreal beings and then, more “sophisticatedly” into psychological archetypes. Only with cumulative evidence, our own evolved technology and restored history through modern scholarship have we now been enabled to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our godspell conditioning, traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. E.O. Wilson, the father of Sociobiology, while rejecting religion as mythology, also sees it as hardwired in the brain as a result of millennia of genetic evolutionary programming.
His opinion takes on a whole new meaning in the context of the new paradigm: his description of this predisposition of the human neurological system is an excellent definition of the genetically engineered human displaying the godspell mentality.
The Second Factor: The Babel Factor, The Splintering of the Human
Race Into Hostile Religions
So, down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate tradition of what some particular “god” intended, what rules to follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal and docile servants. Sometimes we just kill each other over it.
And persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions, evil empires, the saved and the damned, the martyr, the infidel, the saint, the Protestant, the fundamentalist, the atheist, became -- and remain.
The Third Factor: A Tradition of Absolutism, Suppression and Repression
Modern scholarship, working on foundations laid as far back as the German school, has reassessed the Old Testament. When the Mesopotamian records began to be unearthed in the 1800’s, it was realized that the history revealed from 4000 B.C. forward, was the source of the history of the Old Testament. The Jews, allowed to be confined to captivity by the Babylonians by their “god” Jehovah, had drawn on that history and committed forgery (Sitchin) by rewriting it to their need to establish Enlil/Jehovah as their supreme ruler.
That history shows clearly that two Anunnaki brothers, Enlil and Enki had always been at odds with each other personally and politically. Enki was the Anunnaki scientist who, together with his half-sister scientist, Ninhursag, had created humans and had always been favorable to them. Enlil had always had reservations about humans and dominated them with severity.
Gardner has made the case that when the Old Testament referred to The Lord (Adonai, Enki) it was when good things were being done to or for the Hebrews. When terrible things were being done or allowed to happen to them, the reference was always to Jehovah (Yahweh, Enlil) and it was to Enlil’s dominance that they finally capitulated and whom they worshipped in fear. The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It was recognized but treated ambiguously by the large faction of the Hebrews who paid allegiance to Enlil.
The strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism (Jesus was in the bloodline) eventually became known as heterodox Christian was opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the Enlil type fear and subservience tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline.. The reason why women have always been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line.
It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. The restoration of our true human history clearly affords resolution to the perennial Creationist-Evolutionary as well as other conflicts and will lead to a consensual, generic definition of a human and a planetary unity never before experienced. By that release, it also reveals clues to our current genetic questions.
These are best approached through the answers to the most obvious objections that have been raised to the new paradigm.
Scientific Objections to the Thesis
How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways, have evolved on a planet within our solar system whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for much of its orbit?
The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant” planet. This may be understood as having a high core temperature. Although controversial, there is also astrophysical opinion that a large body in elongated orbit is constantly tending toward circular orbit and this causes stresses in the body that could generate a good deal of heat. That their planet is gradually cooling, may be indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing Earth (contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular seeding of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding.
Pertinent here is Harrington’s confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a nice, good planet, could be surrounded by gases, probably has an atmosphere and could support life like ours”. The sunlight level there might be quite different than on earth. Although not always, the Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be obviously sunglasses.
If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet from earth under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why should they have turned out to be so identical to to human species? Sitchin’s answer is based on the collisional event between the intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet Tiamat, the residual part of which recongealed into the Earth after being driven into current Earth orbit.
That the two, or at least one, of the colliding planets was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic compounds, perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity.
Although this author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even trivial, that advanced civilizations would be capable of crossing extremely different genomes, perhaps with even radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki impinged their genes on the genes of Homo Erectus. The Anunnaki skill level, 200,000 years ago, is indicated well by the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained living hybrids but never a satisfactory product which led them to modify Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes.
This provides a comprehensive context in which to understand and explain the enigmatic facts of our being contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceding them and other anthropological anomalies --- at least within the Darwinian model -- of our species existence. We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us, Homo Erectus is currently being promoted; we showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record; our 4000 plus genetic diseases are a total enigma.
We present with very many startling, obvious differences from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management are completely different. Human females don’t have an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least.
If our genome is estimated as 95% to 98% similar to the chimpanzee, how could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus and Anunnaki genomes, or impingement of the advanced code on the lesser advanced one detectable? The author suggests that this is a major question probably answerable only by the geneticists open-minded enough to attack it.
The resolution of that question should provide rich additional clues in itself.
If it is taken as archaeologically and historically demonstrated that we are a genetically engineered, bicameral species, the product of genetically melding two racial genomes, the past becomes a rich archive of anthropological, technical, historical and especially genetic information and data.
Just as the reluctant acknowledgement that ancient records from the Sumerian or Chinese civilizations contained accurate astronomical observations and data opened up a valuable resource to modern astronomers, so the history of our species’ genetic creation in a laboratory pinpointed on the map of east central Africa precisely where the mitochondrial “search for Eve” locates the first human female(s), opens an astounding resource to modern geneticists.
The most important advantage is that, enabled with this knowledge and perspective, geneticists can begin to understand and decipher and interpret our genome with the tremendous advantage of working within a robust context providing major clues as to what to look for and where to look and why.
The ancient records of why, when, and how we were genetically engineered make it abundantly clear that we were brought into existence as a subordinate species, a slave species to relieve the Anunnaki miner echelons. (The essential, detailed documentation through translations and illustrations of the actual genetic processes (in vitro; cloning, etc. ) used by the Anunnaki is found in Sitchin, The Twelfth Planet, chapter 12)
It is specified pointedly that, although the Anunnaki lived, literally, extended lifetimes of thousands of our years (either because of the way they themselves had evolved on their home planet or, perhaps, because of their genetic engineering capabilities to achieve that longevity, and possibly through their use of the monoatomic form of gold) they deliberately did not bestow that potential on us. In fact, it is mentioned clearly that they deliberately withheld it.
This deliberate withholding of immortality and, perhaps, even a shortening of longevity, may provide a major clue to our aging process and mortality. (Sociologically, this is the reason why immortality, in one form or another, has become the sublimated reward for a good life in all the religions.). From the details given in the ancient records, it is conceivable that some engineering of the process was executed deliberately to suppress certain characteristics to make better and docile slaves.
If they were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably be inferred that the quality and completeness of the engineering would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and defects we present. It has been argued theoretically that, although the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative complexity of our organism. But we are not that much more complex genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not hold.
Several significant details in the records of our genetic genesis may hold clues. It is recounted that two kinds of females were created, those who would bear children and those who would not. Determining genetically how we, as sterile mutants when first created, were manipulated to be able to procreate may be a major lead. Finally, knowing that an advanced bloodline of humans, enhanced by additional Anunnaki genes, was created around 4000 B.C. is even more valuable a clue since that bloodline has been carefully nurtured and protected through to our day and, therefore, available for investigation and analysis and comparison.
A primary practical tool would be the devising of a protocol through which a crossing of the two gene codes might be recognized. The ancient records could be interpreted to mean either a complete melding of the two codes or, alternatively, the impingement of selected Anunnaki genes on the Homo Erectus code to tweak up the more primitive code to at least a condition of intelligence and physical competence to handle the mining of gold. It is possible that in some 200,000 years of our existence the accommodation between the codes has smoothed and recognition may be difficult indeed.
The obtaining of some robust Homo Erectus DNA samples from fossils would be a great help. It may evolve that, in working on the genetic diseases from the perspective of the genome being bicameral, those defects may yield an indirect key in some pattern or mechanism that indicates the nature and extent of the splicing of the codes.
During the genetic investigation now in process, therefore, it would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if needed, as well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved.
The information gained would, reciprocally, be a major, pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic history.
source: www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_autor_freer01.htm#Part 1
Glenna C. Burmer, M.D., Ph.D
Eric Drexler, Ph.D
Ralph Merkle, Ph.D
Douglas B. Kell, Ph.D
Craig Venter, Ph.D
National Center For Genetic Resources
The Institute For Neural Cryobiology
Alcor Life Extension Foundation
Overview
Geneticists, generally trained within some form of evolutionary paradigm, assume it as the underlying context within which they search and interpret. This paper, written by a generalist for scientists, is submitted as a brief to inform the reader of an archaeological paradigm, developed over a century and a half, which renders outmoded, corrects and subsumes both the Darwinian evolutionary and creationist models, as related to human history, and provides an expanded, fresh perspective on DNA research.
The most fundamental, critical obstacle blocking interpretive and explanatory progress in the sciences – as well as our educational, political and social processes -- is our lack of a consensual definition of what a generic human being is, what it is to be generically human. Theological, philosophical, scientific and new age definitions rattle around in a criteria vacuum. The creationist-evolutionist conflict is a single, classic example of how effectively we have been Babel-factored into ineffective argument without closure for decades.
The thesis of the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin (1976), provides a robust paradigm which affords the resolution of this, objectively astounding, enervating and divisive problem at the heart of western culture. It frees the discussions of the science, ethics, and philosophy involved from the recycled contexts, criteria and syllogistic gambits which have stultified the western intellect for so long.
Its startling anthropological ramifications provide, not only a generic definition of what a human is but, through a recovered and restored history of our bicameral genome’s initiation and evolution, no less than a key to the decipherment and interpretation of the human genome itself.
Correlated with the current data from the genome projects, general genetics, cloning, and related areas it, further, furnishes vital clues to an explanation of the anomalous fact of our presenting with four thousand plus and counting genetic diseases, a possible reason for so-called “junk” genes, and indicators as to why we should possibly expect to find certain suppressed genes.
A potentially vital and startling contribution to human history by the science of genetics, as a spin off of the current ongoing genome research, is suggested.
Zecharia Sitchin is one of two hundred Sumerian and Semitic scholars on the planet who can read a clay tablet like you and I can read this text. He published his first work, The Twelfth Planet, in 1976 and, subsequently, another six volumes of the Earth Chronicle Series.
From his knowledge of Sumerian, the Semitic and other ancient languages and his research on the same archaeological and Biblical data and materials studied by all archaeologists, acquired over the last one hundred and fifty years, he put forth a radical thesis: the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient cultures (Sumerian: Anunnaki, meaning “those who came down from the heavens”) were not mythological but real flesh and blood humanoid aliens, very much like humans, who had come here from the tenth planet in our solar system, Planet X in the popular press, called Nibiru by the Sumerians, colonizing Earth some 432,000 years ago.
They subsequently genetically engineered our species, 200,000 years ago, originally as slave animals to work in their gold mines, by crossing their own genes with those of Homo Erectus. We became subservient partners with them and, eventually, they phased off the planet leaving our species on our own.
Before one rejects this thesis out of hand, it is well to understand that it is backed up by highly coherent, well researched, well developed archaeological data, documents, history and some two million items of recovered artifacts. A key factor is our having reached a level of technological advancement which allows us to understand high science and technologies present in the past which, until only very recently, could only seem fantastic – particularly genetic engineering. As is the case with scientists in general, archaeologists can adjust to internal and incidental shifts in their consensual context but, when the paradigm itself is threatened with replacement, there inevitably occurs a great deal of very unscientific chest drumming and incisor display.
Obviously, the obstacle here is the word “alien”. Consider that the cardinal reason why the alien topic has been considered the fringe “belief” of unbalanced personalities for so long has been the relentless promotion of that idea by the government for half a century. The Brookings Institution (think tank) study (early ‘50’s, commissioned by the government) concluded that,
'revelation of the alien presence would cause serious disruption in the fundamentalist religions and society and recommended against.'
But extra-solar system aliens are not our focus here.
The Anunnaki, as depicted in hundreds of carvings, reliefs, drawings, and descriptions in the recovered documents, are quite like us, male and female, generally taller and huskier than humans in those times, from within our solar system, at home in our atmosphere, radically different than the alien types allegedly from other solar systems.
If we are half Anunnaki, that should not be so surprising. At the time they were on the planet, they apparently possessed only ballistic rocketry for interplanetary travel, no anti-gravitic technology yet developed.
Objections To This Thesis
Those trained in the sciences, accustomed to carefully crafted protocols and rigorous proof will, no doubt, question this paradigm in several ways.
Quite reasonably, it may be asked why the Sitchin paradigm has not been embraced by the geneticists’ academic counterparts in archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology if the evidence is as voluminous and robust as claimed. It may also be asked, Why has this not been the known and taught history of our kind through all the millennium, why should there have been suppression and perversion of this knowledge? These questions are best answered in historical context and perspective.
There was literally no such thing as the discipline known as Archaeology in Western culture until the 1800’s. The Roman Church controlled and determined the view of the past. The scholastic world, dominated by the Church, followed docilely. Not until paleontological findings of millions of years forced that view to be reevaluated and Schliemann, a wealthy German merchant, refusing to believe that the ancient cities and peoples were legend, dug up several stages of the city of Troy, was a window into the past opened and the mythic view questioned.
Scientific Archaeology, as we know it, came into existence only when academics reluctantly had to acknowledge the past being dug up and collected by amateurs in the Middle East. Archaeologists promptly came to be mistrusted and hated by the religious institutions who feared revelations that would contradict their teachings and the history of the Old Testament.
Most in the scientific world are familiar with the scientist, Galileo, having to capitulate to the Inquisition to save his own life, dying while under house arrest for holding to a heliocentric view of the solar system, claiming to see planets through his telescope. Fewer are aware of the fact that the monk, Giordano Bruno, was burnt at the stake in Rome, through the solicitousness of the Roman Church, only thirty six years before the founding of Harvard University, for holding to the Copernican view and claiming that there had to be other planets and other civilizations in the cosmos.
No one in America, literally, had a Doctorate, at the time of the founding of Harvard University, in 1636 by John Harvard. Increase Mather, a president of Harvard, as a Dissenter, was ineligible for a Doctorate from any English university because all of them were controlled by the Church. Fourteen years after the founding of Harvard, Bishop James Uusher published his “Annales Vertis et Novi Testamenti” dating the beginning of the world at 4004 B.C.
One could be condemned as a heretic for contraverting this doctrine by decree of the Church in 1654 and the stricture was not removed until 1952 (!) by Pope Pius XII. The arithmetical wonder of this fact is that was only 48 years ago. Consider that almost everything written in this paper would have been branded as “heresy” and who knows how DNA research would have been branded only a short time ago.
As late as 1906, the Egyptian Exploration Fund, whose charter stated it was set up to promote archaeologists whose work would reinforce the Old and New Testament, refused to publish the discovery of an Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mount Horeb in the Sinai by Sir Flinders Petrie, the most distinguished in his field at the time. When he published privately they pulled his funding, had the book expunged from the publisher’s records and the British Library never cataloged the work --- on one of the most important discoveries in archaeology. (Sir Laurence Gardner: Bloodline Of The Holy Grail, Genesis Of the Grail Kings )
The mythic interpretation has been promulgated by religions because to recognize the Anunnaki as real would be to open the door to a radical reinterpretation of the entire phenomenon of religion and put into question the real identity of the very deity at center of their belief system. To relegate all the Anunnaki “gods” and their deeds --- except Enlil/Jehovah/Yahweh, the God of the Judeo-Christian religions, who was sublimated out of that category --- to fictional, mythic, unreal status was supremely effective to this end. It is through this millenniums-old tradition of suppression, mythization and manipulative control that the character, content and interpretation in the academic arena has been set and remains, largely, even to this day. Very few are going to make a rubber burning one-eighty over their Ph.D. thesis in Mythology.
In Archaeology, Anthropology, and Paleontology, tenure tetanus prevents most from “going first” to admit they have been wrong in a turn as significant and profoundly revolutionary, perhaps even more so, than the Darwinian shock. Collegiate colitis is all too frequent just from contemplating having to contradict oneself in front of students.
Peer pressure finishes off all but the isolated courageous academic or scientist here and there. Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) is proven correct again. If you want that Ph.D. diploma you will repeat what you know you are supposed to believe and say. If you want that job, that funding... The reason becomes apparent why the academic arena has attempted to ignore this forbidden archaeology and anthropology, and why a few more ruthless of the academic power elite have tried to get Sitchin quick and nasty ad hominem just outside the fact forum.
To this day, Anglican clergy still sit on the boards of English universities. In America, the Constitution is only a negative restraint on religious authoritarian domination. Our schools of higher “learning” still parade the trappings of the medieval university on ceremonial occasions and, unfortunately, all too often still in their limitation of discussion to approved subjects. That the influence of religion on science is still virulent is manifest in the deference shown by politicians to religionists in decisions in matters of genetic research.
The ordinary scientist, although perhaps open and cognizant of the serious scientific objections that have been raised against classic Darwinian theory, is reluctant to question or reassess the evolutionary paradigm because of the erroneous fear that creationism would be the only alternative. In effect, the acceptance of the new paradigm is more difficult because it supersedes and corrects both the creationist and the Darwinian models.
The Creationists were only half wrong and the Evolutionists only half right: there was a creation event but it was a genetic engineering process; there is an evolutionary process but it was not linear from the time the lightning hit the mud to us as the pinnacle of creation. It was interrupted in our regard by the Anunnaki for their own practical purposes. We shall be compelled to introduce an additional category: a genetically synthesized species.( And, if a voice out there is heard to say "Well, thank God for Darwin regardless of how imperfect his work was.." many of us will still not catch the irony in that statement....)
In our time, the position of the genetic specialist can become quite personally disconcerting. Having been trained as an undergraduate to uncritically accept some variation on the Darwinian evolutionary theme, tending to look to fellow scientists, particularly the archaeologists, biologists, and anthropologists for answers to the “big” questions, conditioned, if only subliminally, by religio-cultural tradition, the geneticist finds it difficult enough to decipher the genome much less consider a radically revolutionary paradigm forcing a complete rethinking of the planet.
The purpose of this paper is to respectfully facilitate just that process for the geneticist because the new paradigm contains vital clues and vectors directly related to the geneticist’s quest.
The Demise of the Mythological Explanation of the Gods
Those still holding the mythological interpretation are in an unenviable position. They find themselves having to hold that the same citizens of the first civilizations who, they claim, invented -- or hallucinated -- the gods through their primitive imaginings and naive proto-scientific projections of personality on the great forces of nature were the same primitives who somehow could build the stupendous Giza pyramid; somehow quarry, cut and move into place the one thousand ton stones of the Baalbek “temple” (rocket platform) which even our modern technology cannot begin to lift; somehow know the great precessional cycle of the heavens, the existence of all ten of the planets of our solar system and how our solar system was formed (Enuma Elish document).
The physical locations of the ancient legends as mythic has been gradually disproven beginning with the work of Schliemann and completed with the re-discovery of all the ancient cities and centers on all continents.
The events involving the “gods” of ancient times and the technology attributed to them, previously considered as myth and naive legend, have been gradually proven to be real, beginning with the discovery of documents from the most ancient cities and reinforced with the discovery of the great library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh and the gradual accumulation of some two million pieces of artifact and document confirming those events in great detail. The discovery of ooparts, (high tech tools, toys, artifacts, and technology along with documentation of advanced scientific knowledge ostensibly out of place in time) along with astronomical knowledge of the entire solar system beyond our current level has reinforced the negation of the mythic interpretation.
The interpretation of the “gods”, the Anunnaki themselves, as mythic, unreal beings (academic mythologists) and Jungian archetypes (Joseph Campbell) and the relegation of them to schizophrenic hallucination (Julian Jaynes) has been gradually disproven beginning with the acknowledgment of the reality of the events attributed to them; the discounting of the arguments for their unreality due to the seeming fantastic deeds attributed to them by the development of our technology (rockets, lasers, radio communication, genetic engineering, atomic and particle beam weapons) that duplicate those feats.
This interpretation has been implemented further by the exploration and questions posed early by the German school, pioneers like von Daniken and then completed by the comprehensive and brilliant demonstrations of Sitchin and Sir Laurence Gardner, the English historian and genealogist.
Now that we have begun by walking on the moon and exploring the solar system and have probes going starward, the possibility of an alien civilization coming here is taken for granted and one coming here from inside our solar system trivial, rather than unreal myth. “Mythinformation”, after two hundred years of failure, although still hiding behind tenure in the university, is a dead issue.
The Essence of the Sitchin Paradigm
Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin propounds - proves, in the opinion of this author - that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold.
Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid we could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce.
Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its periodic 3600 year returns.
Some humans were saved by the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had originally genetically created. For thousands of years we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, their soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in the farthest reaches of the planet.
Around 6000 years ago they, probably realizing that they were going to phase off the planet, began to gradually bring humans to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden” and mature and highly advanced character was set up under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” was initiated (Gardner).
These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery schools” but there was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church.
There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.
The Anunnaki became somewhat more remote from humans. By around 1250 B.C. they had gone into their final phase-out mode. The human population and the foremen kings, now left on their own began to fend for themselves. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going through a traumatic transition to racial independence. Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between them.
Religion, as we know it, took form, focused on the “god” or “gods”, clearly and unambiguously known to the humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids, now absent. It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized.
We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went, waiting for Daddy to return to make everything right and tell us what to do for some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions.
The Astronomical Evidence
A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home planet of the Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and characteristics described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased.
Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the residuals, the “wobbles” in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune clearly identifiable.
The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84, produced observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the astronomers on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” -- from which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992 Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information they had at hand, published their findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an “intruder” planet. The search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the ecliptic.
Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his office and they correlated the current findings with the ancient records.
The recovered Enuma Elish document, a history of the formation of our solar system and more, says that, at the time when Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A large wandering planet, called Nibiru, was captured into the system gravitationally.
As it passed by the outer planets it caused the anomalies of their moons, the tilting of Uranus on its side, the dislodging of Pluto from its being a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it into what is now Earth’s orbit to recongeal as Earth, dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all its anomalies.
The shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites. The gouge of our Pacific basin is awesome testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at apogee.
Dr. Robert Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed with all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current probable location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the same.
The Technological Evidence
Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and documents which have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery.
Almost everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc.
The most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced physics community)
Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago.
These ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the historical records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in those times possessing a high technology and that that civilization was indeed the Anunnaki.
The Documentary Evidence
The recorded historical documentation for the existence and deeds of the Anunnaki has become gradually available to us only since the early 1800’s. The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay tablets containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages, military actions and advanced astronomical calculation systems but of the history of the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear from these records that the Sumerians knew these aliens to be real flesh and blood.
The library of the ruler, Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the clay tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading. One of the most impressive finds, in very recent time, has been a sealed, nine foot by six foot room in Sippar holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some 400 elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the history of those ancient times, a sort of time capsule.
The evidence is so overwhelming and robust that, if it weren’t for those with power enough to suppress, it would have been accepted and our world view changed a century ago or, perhaps, sooner.
The Genetic Evidence
The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo-Sapiens and in the same time frame. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000 year old gold mines in that area.)
The evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us.
As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part 3.
Two Definitive Protocols for Proving or Disproving the Sitchin Paradigm
A straightforward approach to prove or disprove the Sitchin paradigm is available from astronomy. A thorough, professional search of our solar system should be able, with current technology, to determine the existence or non-existence of a tenth planet with the characteristics of size, orbit, orbital periodicity, and declination from the ecliptic, as Sitchin has determined from the translations of the ancient records and particularly the Enuma Elish document.
If that planet is not in our solar system or no evidence can be found for an ejection or cataclysmic destructive event then the Sitchin paradigm falls. This search should be undertaken with highest priority. The matter is sufficiently important to clearing up our historical situation that the academic world should be involved as well as the scientific community. It is the opinion of this author and others that, in light of the evidence already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, ‘83-84) and the clear and unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already been found.
A second mode of proof or disproof is available through genetics. We will shortly have the entire human genome read out and its details sorted. That process, and the information available as a result, should afford us the opportunity to examine the entire genome for the evidence of the merging of the two species’ gene codes, Homo Erectus and Anunnaki, a definitive way to prove or disprove Sitchin’s thesis. It is in this process, if proven, that the vital clues to the interpretation of the genome lie as examined in Part 4.
It is the position of this author that, not only will the bicameral nature of the code eventually be recognized but valuable clues found through the new paradigm to a profound understanding of the genome and the human.
The First Factor: Background of Conditioning to Subservience
The overwhelming evidence from the Sitchin paradigm demonstrates conclusively that we were genetically engineered by the Anunnaki and treated as slaves and then limited partners but always as subservient to them. The major ramification (Neil Freer: Breaking the Godspell) of the Sitchin explication is that “religion”, as we have known it, is the transmutation, sublimation of the Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery and then limited, subservient partnership. Since then, we have been going through phases of a traumatic transition to species maturity and independence.
The major characteristic of this process has been the transmutation in all cultures of them, in particular Enlil/Jehovah in Western culture, into a cosmic deity, commonly called “God” in the Judeo-Christian tradition. (Is this atheism? No, not as such. It simply is a long overdue correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective.
Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of the particular local Nefilim "god" of the Hebrew tribe and Christianity, Yahweh/Jehovah. The new paradigm, once the ancient, subservient godspell is dispelled, simply frees us to go one on one with the universe as our own evolutionary artists and to seek directly whatever unthinkable or thinkable ultimate principle is behind it.)
In a later phase we have mythologized them into unreal beings and then, more “sophisticatedly” into psychological archetypes. Only with cumulative evidence, our own evolved technology and restored history through modern scholarship have we now been enabled to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our godspell conditioning, traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. E.O. Wilson, the father of Sociobiology, while rejecting religion as mythology, also sees it as hardwired in the brain as a result of millennia of genetic evolutionary programming.
His opinion takes on a whole new meaning in the context of the new paradigm: his description of this predisposition of the human neurological system is an excellent definition of the genetically engineered human displaying the godspell mentality.
The Second Factor: The Babel Factor, The Splintering of the Human
Race Into Hostile Religions
So, down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate tradition of what some particular “god” intended, what rules to follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal and docile servants. Sometimes we just kill each other over it.
And persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions, evil empires, the saved and the damned, the martyr, the infidel, the saint, the Protestant, the fundamentalist, the atheist, became -- and remain.
The Third Factor: A Tradition of Absolutism, Suppression and Repression
Modern scholarship, working on foundations laid as far back as the German school, has reassessed the Old Testament. When the Mesopotamian records began to be unearthed in the 1800’s, it was realized that the history revealed from 4000 B.C. forward, was the source of the history of the Old Testament. The Jews, allowed to be confined to captivity by the Babylonians by their “god” Jehovah, had drawn on that history and committed forgery (Sitchin) by rewriting it to their need to establish Enlil/Jehovah as their supreme ruler.
That history shows clearly that two Anunnaki brothers, Enlil and Enki had always been at odds with each other personally and politically. Enki was the Anunnaki scientist who, together with his half-sister scientist, Ninhursag, had created humans and had always been favorable to them. Enlil had always had reservations about humans and dominated them with severity.
Gardner has made the case that when the Old Testament referred to The Lord (Adonai, Enki) it was when good things were being done to or for the Hebrews. When terrible things were being done or allowed to happen to them, the reference was always to Jehovah (Yahweh, Enlil) and it was to Enlil’s dominance that they finally capitulated and whom they worshipped in fear. The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It was recognized but treated ambiguously by the large faction of the Hebrews who paid allegiance to Enlil.
The strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism (Jesus was in the bloodline) eventually became known as heterodox Christian was opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the Enlil type fear and subservience tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline.. The reason why women have always been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line.
It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. The restoration of our true human history clearly affords resolution to the perennial Creationist-Evolutionary as well as other conflicts and will lead to a consensual, generic definition of a human and a planetary unity never before experienced. By that release, it also reveals clues to our current genetic questions.
These are best approached through the answers to the most obvious objections that have been raised to the new paradigm.
Scientific Objections to the Thesis
How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways, have evolved on a planet within our solar system whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for much of its orbit?
The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant” planet. This may be understood as having a high core temperature. Although controversial, there is also astrophysical opinion that a large body in elongated orbit is constantly tending toward circular orbit and this causes stresses in the body that could generate a good deal of heat. That their planet is gradually cooling, may be indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing Earth (contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular seeding of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding.
Pertinent here is Harrington’s confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a nice, good planet, could be surrounded by gases, probably has an atmosphere and could support life like ours”. The sunlight level there might be quite different than on earth. Although not always, the Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be obviously sunglasses.
If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet from earth under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why should they have turned out to be so identical to to human species? Sitchin’s answer is based on the collisional event between the intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet Tiamat, the residual part of which recongealed into the Earth after being driven into current Earth orbit.
That the two, or at least one, of the colliding planets was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic compounds, perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity.
Although this author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even trivial, that advanced civilizations would be capable of crossing extremely different genomes, perhaps with even radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki impinged their genes on the genes of Homo Erectus. The Anunnaki skill level, 200,000 years ago, is indicated well by the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained living hybrids but never a satisfactory product which led them to modify Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes.
This provides a comprehensive context in which to understand and explain the enigmatic facts of our being contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceding them and other anthropological anomalies --- at least within the Darwinian model -- of our species existence. We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us, Homo Erectus is currently being promoted; we showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record; our 4000 plus genetic diseases are a total enigma.
We present with very many startling, obvious differences from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management are completely different. Human females don’t have an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least.
If our genome is estimated as 95% to 98% similar to the chimpanzee, how could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus and Anunnaki genomes, or impingement of the advanced code on the lesser advanced one detectable? The author suggests that this is a major question probably answerable only by the geneticists open-minded enough to attack it.
The resolution of that question should provide rich additional clues in itself.
If it is taken as archaeologically and historically demonstrated that we are a genetically engineered, bicameral species, the product of genetically melding two racial genomes, the past becomes a rich archive of anthropological, technical, historical and especially genetic information and data.
Just as the reluctant acknowledgement that ancient records from the Sumerian or Chinese civilizations contained accurate astronomical observations and data opened up a valuable resource to modern astronomers, so the history of our species’ genetic creation in a laboratory pinpointed on the map of east central Africa precisely where the mitochondrial “search for Eve” locates the first human female(s), opens an astounding resource to modern geneticists.
The most important advantage is that, enabled with this knowledge and perspective, geneticists can begin to understand and decipher and interpret our genome with the tremendous advantage of working within a robust context providing major clues as to what to look for and where to look and why.
The ancient records of why, when, and how we were genetically engineered make it abundantly clear that we were brought into existence as a subordinate species, a slave species to relieve the Anunnaki miner echelons. (The essential, detailed documentation through translations and illustrations of the actual genetic processes (in vitro; cloning, etc. ) used by the Anunnaki is found in Sitchin, The Twelfth Planet, chapter 12)
It is specified pointedly that, although the Anunnaki lived, literally, extended lifetimes of thousands of our years (either because of the way they themselves had evolved on their home planet or, perhaps, because of their genetic engineering capabilities to achieve that longevity, and possibly through their use of the monoatomic form of gold) they deliberately did not bestow that potential on us. In fact, it is mentioned clearly that they deliberately withheld it.
This deliberate withholding of immortality and, perhaps, even a shortening of longevity, may provide a major clue to our aging process and mortality. (Sociologically, this is the reason why immortality, in one form or another, has become the sublimated reward for a good life in all the religions.). From the details given in the ancient records, it is conceivable that some engineering of the process was executed deliberately to suppress certain characteristics to make better and docile slaves.
If they were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably be inferred that the quality and completeness of the engineering would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and defects we present. It has been argued theoretically that, although the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative complexity of our organism. But we are not that much more complex genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not hold.
Several significant details in the records of our genetic genesis may hold clues. It is recounted that two kinds of females were created, those who would bear children and those who would not. Determining genetically how we, as sterile mutants when first created, were manipulated to be able to procreate may be a major lead. Finally, knowing that an advanced bloodline of humans, enhanced by additional Anunnaki genes, was created around 4000 B.C. is even more valuable a clue since that bloodline has been carefully nurtured and protected through to our day and, therefore, available for investigation and analysis and comparison.
A primary practical tool would be the devising of a protocol through which a crossing of the two gene codes might be recognized. The ancient records could be interpreted to mean either a complete melding of the two codes or, alternatively, the impingement of selected Anunnaki genes on the Homo Erectus code to tweak up the more primitive code to at least a condition of intelligence and physical competence to handle the mining of gold. It is possible that in some 200,000 years of our existence the accommodation between the codes has smoothed and recognition may be difficult indeed.
The obtaining of some robust Homo Erectus DNA samples from fossils would be a great help. It may evolve that, in working on the genetic diseases from the perspective of the genome being bicameral, those defects may yield an indirect key in some pattern or mechanism that indicates the nature and extent of the splicing of the codes.
During the genetic investigation now in process, therefore, it would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if needed, as well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved.
The information gained would, reciprocally, be a major, pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic history.
source: www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_autor_freer01.htm#Part 1